![]() ![]() Furthermore, image stabilization and solid auto exposure are needed as well. When looking for a camera to use for v-logging, good audio quality is essential. Video-logging: GoPro HERO11 vs DJI Osmo Action 3 ![]() Snorkeling – using mostly a selfie stick and static placement.Windsurfing – again using the chesty plus mounting the cams on the boom of the sail.Mountainbiking – using my chest harness (the chesty) and different other mount options.V-logging – testing mostly the audio capabilities (a traditional Achilles’ heel of all action cams).In case you are looking to invest in one of these cameras, my goal is to help you make a better decision by demonstrating the main differences between the HERO11 and Action 3 in the following use cases: Why manufacturers wait for extensive user feedback after releasing a new product to implement firmware updates instead of releasing a fully functioning product in the first place is beyond me, but that is something I will have to learn to live with. overall better image quality for video (if you don’t use D-Cinelike)Īs much as we look forward to updates, they don’t necessarily make my job as a camera tester any easier.adds RockSteady+ (which crops more into the image).adds HDR recording (only up to 4K30), no D-Cinelike 10bit possible.adds 10 Bit video recording when using D-Cinelike.So, I decided to test them both thoroughly by using them in different scenarios and over a longer period of time to really test how far I can go.Īs it ever so often happens, DJI released a new firmware (V) for the Action 3, just as I was about to finish the video and article. Image credit: CineDĪs technology proceeds, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to clearly distinguish any major differences in feature set or image quality when looking at the DJI Osmo Action 3 and the GoPro HERO11. The DJI Osmo Action 3 and GoPro HERO11 – Slightly used after two months.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |